Subscribe to Our Newsletter



Code:

Joomla : Talis Advisory Servi

Browse by Tag

fees eugene fama va finra insurance be your own bank inflation bill miller scott maxwell fama/french michael lewis banz diversification sustainability portfolio fiduciary value the investment answer financial press david booth fund selection william sharpe roubini interest rates finra survey mutual funds quarterly investment review sovereign debt vanguard broker small cap spiva capm new normal whole life investment philosophy toxic assets ubs risk tolerance talis dodd-frank registered investment advisor wealth management required minimum distribution economy wall street journal form adv exchange traded fund morningstar gordon murray free lunch asset class dave ramsey jim cramer planning tax separately managed account emerging markets ken heebner currency hedging disclosure bonds benchmarks deficit ken french fee only passive management texas monthly asset allocation custodian circle of wealth mutual funds d magazine risk sharpe ratio top wealth manager infinite banking dfa wall street passive management ira backtesting 401(k) behavioral finance joel greenblatt disability insurance index funds erisa credit risk market timing efficiency active management debt hedge funds real estate investment trust fiduciary life insurance s&p 500 return retirement planning dalbar fund flow strategic asset allocation green investing chasing performance liquidity risk flash crash savings index buy and hold recession sec unified managed account philanthropy charitable giving volatility real estate blaine lourd life settlements barron's gold predictions active management fees advisor wealth preservation lost decade robert merton milton friedman modern portfolio theory brent everett dividends larry kudlow capital markets rebalancing exchange traded note erisa stocks



Follow us on Facebook and Twitter

facebook twitter

Advisor Blog

Subscribe to feed Viewing entries tagged sharpe ratio

Inside The Sharpe Ratio - Why It Matters

Posted by Brent Everett
Brent Everett
Brent Everett founded Profisys, LLC, a fee-only Registered Investment Advisor, in 1998. While acting as Manag...
User is currently offline
on Tuesday, February 16, 2010
in Unconventional Wisdom · 0 Comments

In a discussion with Scott Maxwell yesterday about fixed income choices for the portfolio of one of his clients, we found that we made frequent references to the Sharpe Ratio of the fixed income funds and the portfolio design. This lead us to wonder how many clients or prospective clients really understand this important risk/return measurement.

The Sharpe Ratio is named after William Sharpe, winner of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences for his work on the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM - more about that in a future post). The ratio describes how much excess return is generated by a portfolio in exchange for the additional volatility of the portfolio that the investor must endure. The point is that an investor must be properly compensated for bearing additional risk beyond that of a risk-free asset.

S(x) = (rx-Rf) / std dev (x)

This formula describes the calculation where the Sharpe Ratio of the portfolio is equal to the average rate of return for the portfolio minus the risk free rate of return (usually short-term T-bills) divided by the standard deviation of the portfolio.

Why is this so important? Because it describes the efficiency of the portfolio - how much return is generated for each unit of risk taken. Obviously, a higher number is better. This allows us to compare the performance of a portfolio to another that takes more or less risk. It also allows us to maximize the efficiency of portfolio designs.

Consider two portfolios with identical returns. One is riskier than the other. A rational investor would always choose the least risky portfolio with the same return. Conversely, consider two portfolios with identical risk. One has a higher return. A rational investor would always choose the portfolio with the highest return. The Sharpe Ratio provides a method for calculating this risk/return tradeoff.